What Others Said About "The Covered Wagon"

 

Richard Koszarski . . .

"This leaves us with "The Covered Wagon," a film whose value, even at the time of its initial release, was the subject of some debate. . . Largely thanks to the camerawork of Karl Brown, who photographed most of Cruze's silent films, "The Covered Wagon" set a visual standard for Western epics to come and was the dominant critical and commercial success of the season. . . Many were impressed by the palpable authenticity of props and locations in this pageant of American history, but details of the action were criticized by a knowledgeable few, which others found the casting of J. Warren Kerrigan and Lois Wilson in the leads a serious mistake. But the film's very success in launching a cycle of epic

Westerns soon began to cut into its reputation. . . Although Kevin Brownlow defends the film for its documentary value, George Fenin and William K. Everson in "The Western" more accurately reflect current opinion when they berate it for being 'slow and pedestrian, often crudely faked,' and 'of negligible creative value.'" ("An Evening's Entertainment: The Age of the Silent Feature Picture, 1915-1928," University of California Press, 1994)


Lois Wilson . . .

"Conditions were rough, but no worse than some of the other westerns I was on. I got slight frostbite, we ran out of supplies and had to live on apples and baked beans for a while, but I loved every minute of 'The Covered Wagon.' Oh, we were cold, but I don't think the film would have been as good if we hadn't been uncomfortable and if we hadn't run into unexpected circumstances. For instance, snow. Nobody expected snow in the desert at that time of year. The tents were so laden with snow they were practically falling on our beds. So, Walter Woods, who was out there with us, wrote in a snow sequence."

"Do you realize that the covered wagons in that picture were practically all original Conestogas? Famous Players advertised, and people came from all over the Middle West with their wagons and horses. Some of them brought their families. They were paid two dollars a day each, and two dollars a day for stock, and they were fed. That was it." (quoted by Kevin Brownlow in "The Parade's Gone By," University of California Press, 1968)


Lois Wilson . . .

"The girl who had been originally considered for the heroine in 'The Covered Wagon' told me after the picture was released, 'Lois, I would never have been as good in that part as you were.' I don't know that I was. A lot of people thought I looked too well, you know. The critics weren't very nice to me, but I thought I did a pretty good job.

"It was an amazing picture, and one of the reasons that it became a great picture was that we went through a lot of the same hardships that pioneers had gone through." (quoted by William H. Drew in "Speaking of Silents: First Ladies of the Screen," The Vestal Press, 1989)


Joe Franklin . . .

"Perhaps the value of 'The Covered Wagon' as a film tends to be exaggerated a little today, but its importance as one of the major milestones in the history of the western movie can never be emphasized too much.

"Today, 'The Covered Wagon,' which was directed by James Cruze, seems a trifle slow and ordinary, due no doubt to years of repetition and improvement, but in the early 20's, its effect was startling. Its deliberate pacing and almost semi-documentary style created an impression of true authenticity, even though Cruze himself knew little of the West. . .

"Despite its size, 'The Covered Wagon' does disappoint in terms of action. Action was just a means to an end for Cruze, and he never exploited it, or built it, via careful editing the way Griffith or John Ford did." ("Classics of the Silent Screen," The Citadel Press, 1959)


Neil Sinyard . . .

"The first big epic western was 'The Covered Wagon' (1923) directed by James Cruze . . . The cameraman, Karl Brown, who had previously been an assistant to Griffith, was later to recall that Cruze had accepted the directing job with considerable lack of enthusiasm, for his opinion of Westerns at that time was similar to that of the writer Ben Hecht: 'movies about horses for horses.' What seemed to change his mind, remarkably enough, was a viewing of Robert Flaherty's 'Nanook of the North,' which gave Cruze a new slant on the way to handle the material. As the film evolved, Cruze found himself approaching 'The Covered Wagon' less from the point of view of a story than a slice of history, a documentary of the original trek. Cruze shifted the film's focus away from the individual towards the group and towards the event itself, which began to assume epic proportions as an important moment in the country's history. The film was an enormous success." ("Silent Movies," Brompton Books, Corp., 1990)


Richard Griffith, Arthur Mayer and Eileen Bowser . . .

". . . he (William S. Hart) rejected 'The Covered Wagon' on the ground that corralling a wagon train in a blind box canyon in Indian country, or swimming oxen across a river with their neck yokes on were 'errors that would make a Western man refuse to speak to his own brother.'" ("The Movies," Simon and Schuster, 1957)


Robert E. Sherwood . . .

"'The Covered Wagon' was a great picture, not so much because it was based upon a magnificent theme as because it was produced with genuine skill. Jesse L. Lasky, Vice-President of the Paramount Company, was one of the first to recognize its potentialities, and he backed it to the limit. He assigned it to James Cruze, a director who had been advancing rapidly in popular esteem, and he entrusted the adaptation of the story to Jack Cunningham. Both men stuck closely to the point. They refrained from trimming Hough's story with any movie hokum, having sense enough to appreciate the essential simplicity of the drama.

"The outstanding quality of 'The Covered Wagon' as it appeared in its final form was its absolute honesty. There was nothing false in it, nothing that was insincere, or trumped up, or phony. James Cruze obtained his effects by legitimate methods, without recourse to the mechanical tricks which have spoiled so many potentially good pictures in the past. In Jack Cunningham's adaptation of the story, the same spirit of straightforwardness prevailed. He had the wisdom to realize that he must set forth the details as simply and directly as possible; he shunned spurious hokum in his drama, his sentiment and his humor, and relied instead on the intense vigor of reality.

"The most stalwart and picturesque figure in the cast was Ernest Torrence, a lean Scotsman who quitted musical comedy three years ago to play the villain in 'Tol'able David'

"The hero of the piece was J. Warren Kerrigan, a star who dates back to the earliest days of Western melodramas in the movies. . . In 'The Covered Wagon' he displayed his great horsemanship to good advantage, but his performance was not in harmony with the picture as a whole. In fact, he was the one figure in the entire picture who suggested that, after all, it was only a movie - and not an actual record of the real conquest of the West." ("The Best Moving Pictures of 1922-1923," Small, Maynard and Company, 1923)


from MOTION PICTURE CLASSIC, September, 1925 . . .

"Of pictures released in the past two years, 'The Covered Wagon,' 'Robin Hood,' 'The Iron Horse,' 'The Ten Commandments,' 'The Thief of Bagdad,' are the only ones that will earn incomes of mammoth proportions.

"'The Covered Wagon' was the film which brought to the screen an era of epics. The idea of making the film version of this Emerson Hough story an 'epic' of the pioneer steelers of our Western Empire, instead of merely a film dealing with the lives of some fictitious characters, made about $2,000,000 difference in the business that the production will do.

"'The Covered Wagon' called for an outlay of $350,000 in the making and has already brought in $2,000,000. Before it is finished, the James Cruze production should gross $4,000,000."


Return to "The Covered Wagon" page